The Role of the Law in Pauline Theology: A Study of Romans and Galatians
Abstract
This study examines Paul's complex and nuanced understanding of the Mosaic Law within the framework of the New Covenant established through Christ. Through careful exegetical analysis of key Pauline texts—including Romans 7:7-25, Galatians 3:15-25, 2 Corinthians 3:1-18, and Romans 10:4—this research explores the tension between Paul's affirmation of the Law's divine origin and his claim that believers are no longer "under the law." The study situates Paul's theology within Second Temple Jewish interpretive traditions, engaging with both traditional and contemporary scholarly perspectives, including the New Perspective on Paul and more recent "Paul within Judaism" approaches. Methodologically, the research employs historical-critical, rhetorical, and intertextual analyses while maintaining sensitivity to the theological dimensions of Paul's arguments. The findings reveal that Paul develops a sophisticated salvation-historical framework in which the Law functioned as a divinely ordained but temporary measure, simultaneously revealing sin, establishing covenant boundaries, and foreshadowing Christ. Rather than rejecting the Law, Paul reinterprets it through a christological lens that transforms its function while preserving its ethical substance. This understanding has significant implications for Christian-Jewish relations, biblical hermeneutics, and contemporary theological ethics.
Introduction
Research Question and Scope
Few questions in Pauline scholarship have generated as much debate as the apostle's understanding of the Mosaic Law (Torah) and its relationship to the New Covenant in Christ. As a former Pharisee deeply committed to the Law (Phil 3:5-6), Paul underwent a profound transformation that led him to proclaim a gospel in which righteousness comes "apart from the law" (Rom 3:21) and in which Gentiles need not adopt Torah observance to belong to God's people. This apparent tension raises a central question: How could Paul simultaneously affirm the Law's divine origin and goodness while arguing that believers are no longer "under the law"?
This study examines this question through careful analysis of Paul's most extended discussions of the Law in Romans, Galatians, and 2 Corinthians. It explores how Paul navigated the complex relationship between continuity and discontinuity, between the Law's enduring value and its limitations within his theological framework. The research focuses specifically on four dimensions of this relationship: (1) Paul's understanding of the Law as both divine revelation and burden, (2) his account of the Law's function in revealing sin, (3) his argument for justification apart from the Law, and (4) his vision of the Law's positive role in Christian ethics after Christ.
The scope of this study encompasses Paul's undisputed letters, with particular attention to Romans, Galatians, and 2 Corinthians as the texts containing his most sustained reflections on the Law. While acknowledging scholarly debates about the authenticity of certain Pauline letters, this study focuses on passages where Paul's authorship is widely accepted, allowing for more secure conclusions about his theological perspective.
Methodological Approach
This study employs multiple complementary methodological approaches to analyze Paul's theology of the Law and New Covenant:
Historical-critical analysis: Paul's letters are situated within their specific historical contexts, examining the particular situations he addressed and the Jewish and Greco-Roman backgrounds that informed his thinking. This approach recognizes that Paul wrote as a first-century Jewish believer in Jesus addressing specific communities with concrete concerns rather than developing abstract theological systems.
Exegetical analysis: Close readings of key Pauline texts in their original Greek provide the foundation for understanding his theology. This includes lexical analysis of crucial terms (νόμος/nomos, ἔργα νόμου/erga nomou, διαθήκη/diathēkē), syntactical examination of important phrases, and consideration of rhetorical structures in Paul's arguments.
Intertextual analysis: Paul frequently quotes, alludes to, and echoes the Hebrew Scriptures in developing his understanding of the Law. This study examines how Paul reinterpreted these texts through a christological lens, creating new meanings while maintaining connections to their original contexts.
Theological analysis: While grounding the study in historical and exegetical considerations, this research also attends to the theological coherence of Paul's thought, recognizing that his statements about the Law form part of a broader theological framework centered on Christ's death and resurrection.
This multifaceted approach seeks to avoid several methodological pitfalls common in studies of Paul and the Law. First, it resists imposing post-Reformation theological categories (like "law versus gospel") onto Paul's first-century Jewish thought world. Second, it avoids fragmenting Paul's statements about the Law into unrelated assertions, instead seeking coherence within his theological vision. Third, it maintains critical distance from both traditional Christian supersessionist readings that dismiss the Law's ongoing value and from apologetic approaches that minimize the radical nature of Paul's reinterpretation of Torah.
Theoretical Framework
This study adopts a salvation-historical framework for understanding Paul's theology of the Law. This approach recognizes that Paul situated his discussion of the Law within a broader narrative of God's redemptive work across history, culminating in Christ. Rather than presenting abstract theological principles, Paul located the Law within a historical sequence: promise to Abraham → Law through Moses → fulfillment in Christ. This framework helps explain Paul's seemingly contradictory statements about the Law: its divine origin and goodness, yet its temporary and preparatory nature; its inability to give life, yet its reflection of God's will.
This salvation-historical approach is complemented by attention to the social dimensions of Paul's theology. Paul addressed communities navigating complex ethnic and religious boundaries between Jews and Gentiles. His theology of the Law responded to practical questions about community formation and identity markers: Must Gentiles be circumcised? Should mixed communities observe kosher laws? How do diverse believers form unified communities while respecting different cultural practices? These social concerns shaped Paul's theological formulations in ways that purely doctrinal approaches may overlook.
Additionally, this study employs aspects of narrative analysis, recognizing that Paul's arguments often presuppose a master story of God's dealings with Israel and the nations. The Law plays a crucial role in this narrative as both a major plot development (the Sinai covenant) and a character that performs specific functions until the climactic arrival of Christ. Understanding this narrative substructure helps illuminate Paul's view of the Law as having a legitimate but temporary role in the divine drama.
Defining Key Terms
Before proceeding to the analysis, several key terms require precise definition:
Law (νόμος/nomos): In Paul's writings, this term carries multiple meanings depending on context. It can refer to: (a) the Torah as a body of texts (the Pentateuch); (b) specific commandments and prohibitions; (c) the Sinai covenant as a whole; (d) a general principle or rule; or (e) in some contexts, the power of sin operating through the commandment. This study will carefully distinguish these meanings in Paul's arguments.
Works of the Law (ἔργα νόμου/erga nomou): This disputed phrase appears primarily in Galatians and Romans. Traditional interpretations understood it as referring to human efforts to earn salvation through law-keeping. The New Perspective has reinterpreted it as referring specifically to boundary-marking practices that distinguished Jews from Gentiles (especially circumcision, Sabbath, and food laws). This study examines the phrase in its specific contexts to determine its meaning in Paul's argument.
New Covenant (καινὴ διαθήκη/kainē diathēkē): While this specific phrase appears only once in Paul's letters (1 Cor 11:25; cf. 2 Cor 3:6), the concept of a new covenant relationship established through Christ underlies much of his theology. This study examines how Paul understood this concept in relation to Jeremiah's prophecy of a new covenant (Jer 31:31-34) and how it shaped his understanding of the Mosaic covenant.
Under the Law (ὑπὸ νόμον/hypo nomon): Paul frequently states that believers are no longer "under the law" (Rom 6:14-15; Gal 3:23; 4:4-5, 21; 5:18; 1 Cor 9:20). This phrase requires careful analysis, as it could refer to being under: (a) the Law's condemnation; (b) the Law's jurisdiction or authority; (c) the Law as a system of religious identity; or (d) the power of sin working through the Law.
With these methodological considerations established, we now turn to the four major dimensions of Paul's theology of the Law and New Covenant.
Case Study 1: Romans 7:7-25 and the Law as Divine Revelation and Burden
Exegetical Analysis of Romans 7:7-25
Romans 7:7-25 presents one of Paul's most complex and contested discussions of the Law. This passage appears within Paul's broader argument about salvation in Romans 5-8, following his declaration that believers are "not under law but under grace" (6:14). In chapter 7, Paul explores the relationship between the Law, sin, and the human condition through a dramatic first-person narrative that has generated extensive scholarly debate.
The passage consists of two main sections: verses 7-13, which explain the relationship between sin and the Law, and verses 14-25, which describe the conflict experienced by the "I" speaker caught between knowing the good and doing evil. Throughout, Paul maintains a crucial distinction between the Law itself and the effects of sin working through the Law.
Paul begins with a rhetorical question that frames the entire discussion: "What then shall we say? That the law is sin?" (7:7a). His emphatic response—μὴ γένοιτο (mē genoito, "By no means!")—establishes his fundamental position: the Law itself is not the problem. Rather, Paul explains, "Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin" (7:7b). The verb ἔγνων (egnōn, "I knew") indicates experiential knowledge rather than mere intellectual awareness. Paul illustrates with the specific commandment against coveting (ἐπιθυμήσεις/epithymēseis), drawn from the Decalogue (Exod 20:17; Deut 5:21): "I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, 'You shall not covet'" (7:7c).
In verse 8, Paul introduces a critical dynamic: "But sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness." The phrase ἀφορμὴν λαβοῦσα (aphormēn labousa, "seizing an opportunity") personifies sin as an active power that exploits the commandment. Significantly, Paul states that "apart from the law, sin lies dead" (7:8b), suggesting that sin requires the Law to fully activate its destructive potential.
Verses 9-11 present a compressed biographical narrative: "I was once alive apart from the law, but when the commandment came, sin came alive and I died, and the very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me. For sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me." The temporal references ("once," "when") have generated debate about whether Paul describes his pre-conversion experience, a developmental stage (perhaps childhood innocence), or a salvation-historical moment (Adam before the prohibition or Israel before Sinai). The language of deception (ἐξηπάτησέν/exēpatēsen) echoes Genesis 3:13 (LXX), suggesting an Adamic typology: like Adam, the "I" was deceived through the commandment, resulting in death.
In verses 12-13, Paul reaffirms the Law's goodness while explaining its deadly effect: "So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good... Did that which is good, then, bring death to me? By no means! It was sin, producing death in me through what is good." This careful distinction between the Law itself (ἅγιος/hagios, "holy") and its effects when encountered by sinful humanity forms the theological core of Paul's argument.
The second section (vv. 14-25) intensifies the internal conflict. Verse 14 establishes a fundamental contrast: "For we know that the law is spiritual (πνευματικός/pneumatikos), but I am of the flesh (σάρκινος/sarkinos), sold under sin." This acknowledgment of the Law's spiritual nature alongside human carnality frames the ensuing struggle. The perfect tense of πεπραμένος (pepramenos, "having been sold") suggests a completed action with ongoing results—the "I" exists in a state of slavery to sin.
Verses 15-20 describe a profound internal division within the "I": "I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate" (v. 15). This conflict between intention and action appears in Greek philosophical discourse (notably in Epictetus and Ovid's famous "video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor"), but Paul gives it a distinctively theological interpretation. The repeated contrast between θέλω (thelō, "I will/want") and ποιῶ/πράσσω (poiō/prassō, "I do/practice") emphasizes the gap between moral knowledge and moral action.
In verse 17, Paul introduces a crucial distinction: "So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me." This is not an abdication of responsibility but a recognition that sin functions as an indwelling power, creating a divided self. The phrase οἰκοῦσα ἐν ἐμοὶ ἁμαρτία (oikousa en emoi hamartia, "sin dwelling in me") appears three times (vv. 17, 20), emphasizing sin's persistent presence.
The climax comes in verses 21-25, where Paul articulates the fundamental conflict: "I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand" (v. 21). Here, "law" (νόμος/nomos) refers not to Torah but to a governing principle. The internal struggle reaches its peak in verse 24's anguished cry: "Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?" The deliverance comes not through the Law but through Christ: "Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!" (v. 25a). The passage concludes by restating the division: "So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin" (v. 25b).
The Contested Identity of the "I" in Romans 7
The identity of the "I" (ἐγώ/egō) in Romans 7 has generated extensive scholarly debate with significant implications for understanding Paul's view of the Law. Four main interpretations have been proposed:
The autobiographical view: Many interpreters, including Augustine (in his later works) and Luther, understood the "I" as Paul describing his own experience, either pre-conversion (vv. 7-13) and post-conversion (vv. 14-25), or entirely as a Christian struggling with sin. This view emphasizes the ongoing moral struggle of believers, even after conversion.
The pre-Christian view: Other scholars, including Origen, the Greek Fathers, and many modern commentators (e.g., Käsemann, Dunn), argue that the "I" represents pre-Christian experience under the Law, whether Paul's specifically or generally. In this view, the passage describes the inability of the Law to overcome sin, setting up the contrast with life in the Spirit in Romans 8.
The Israel/Adam view: Some interpreters (e.g., Moo, Wright) see the "I" as primarily representing Israel under the Law, recapitulating Adam's experience. The narrative in verses 9-11 recalls both Adam receiving the prohibition in Eden and Israel receiving the Law at Sinai, with similar results—sin's deception leading to death.
The rhetorical view: Others (e.g., Stowers, Tobin) emphasize the prosopopoeia (speech-in-character) device, suggesting Paul adopts a rhetorical persona to illustrate the plight of those under the Law. This view focuses on the rhetorical function of the "I" rather than its biographical reference.
These interpretations need not be mutually exclusive. Paul likely employs a complex "I" that functions at multiple levels—autobiographical, representative, and rhetorical. Several considerations support this multilayered reading. First, the shift from past tense (vv. 7-13) to present tense (vv. 14-25) suggests different temporal perspectives within the unified "I." Second, Paul elsewhere uses the first person to represent broader groups (e.g., 1 Cor 13:1-3; Gal 2:18-21). Third, the passage's Adamic allusions and Israel typology suggest a salvation-historical dimension beyond Paul's personal experience.
This multidimensional "I" enables Paul to present the Law's function through a personal narrative that simultaneously carries universal and salvation-historical significance. Through this rhetorical strategy, Paul establishes a crucial distinction between the Law itself and its effects when encountered by sinful humanity—a distinction central to his theology.
The Law as Divine Revelation
Within the complex argument of Romans 7, Paul maintains an unambiguous affirmation of the Law's divine origin and inherent goodness. This positive assessment appears most explicitly in verse 12: "So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good" (ὥστε ὁ μὲν νόμος ἅγιος καὶ ἡ ἐντολὴ ἁγία καὶ δικαία καὶ ἀγαθή). The emphatic construction and triple adjectives underscore Paul's reverence for the Law as God's revelation. Similarly, in verse 14, Paul calls the Law "spiritual" (πνευματικός/pneumatikos), indicating its divine origin and character.
This positive evaluation aligns with Paul's statement in Romans 7:22 that he "delights in the law of God in [his] inner being" (συνήδομαι γὰρ τῷ νόμῳ τοῦ θεοῦ κατὰ τὸν ἔσω ἄνθρωπον). The verb συνήδομαι (synēdomai, "I delight together with") suggests not mere agreement but joyful affirmation. This positive assessment continues in Romans 7:25, where Paul states that "with my mind I serve the law of God" (αὐτὸς ἐγὼ τῷ μὲν νοῒ δουλεύω νόμῳ θεοῦ).
These affirmations reflect Paul's Jewish heritage, where Torah represented God's gracious gift revealing divine will and wisdom. As E.P. Sanders has demonstrated, Second Temple Judaism understood the Law primarily as a response to divine grace, not a means of earning salvation. The Psalms frequently celebrate Torah as divine revelation bringing wisdom and joy (e.g., Ps 19:7-11; 119), a sentiment Paul echoes in Romans 7:22.
Furthermore, Paul affirms in Romans 3:1-2 that the Jewish people were "entrusted with the oracles of God" (ἐπιστεύθησαν τὰ λόγια τοῦ θεοῦ), acknowledging the privilege of receiving divine revelation through the Law. In Romans 9:4, he includes "the giving of the law" (ἡ νομοθεσία) among Israel's privileges, alongside adoption, glory, covenants, worship, and promises.
This positive assessment of the Law as divine revelation forms an essential foundation for Paul's theology. Whatever limitations or negative effects Paul attributes to the Law, they do not derive from any deficiency in the Law itself but from its encounter with human sinfulness.
The Law as Burden
Despite his affirmation of the Law's divine origin and inherent goodness, Paul also presents the Law as a burden that human beings, in their sinful condition, cannot successfully bear. This burden manifests in several ways throughout Romans 7.
First, the Law creates consciousness of sin without providing the power to overcome it. In Romans 7:7-11, the Law brings knowledge of sin ("I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, 'You shall not covet'") but simultaneously provokes sin's activity ("sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness"). This dynamic creates a tragic situation where greater awareness of moral demands leads to greater consciousness of moral failure.
Second, the Law, when encountered by sinful humanity, produces death rather than life. Paul states in Romans 7:10 that "the very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me" (ἡ ἐντολὴ ἡ εἰς ζωήν, αὕτη εἰς θάνατον). This stark reversal—what was intended for life becoming an instrument of death—points to the Law's burden when its demands encounter human inability. The phrase εὑρέθη μοι (heurethē moi, "was found by me") suggests personal discovery through experience rather than abstract theological principle.
Third, the Law intensifies the power of sin precisely through its goodness. Paul explains in Romans 7:13 that "sin, in order to be shown to be sin, used what is good to bring about my death, so that through the commandment sin might become sinful beyond measure" (ἡ ἁμαρτία... διὰ τῆς ἐντολῆς ὑπερβολὴ ἁμαρτωλὸς). This paradoxical dynamic—the Law's goodness becoming the occasion for sin's increased power—transforms divine revelation into human burden.
Finally, the Law creates internal conflict without resolving it. The divided self portrayed in Romans 7:14-25 knows and approves the Law's demands but lacks the power to fulfill them. This "captivity to the law of sin" (αἰχμαλωτίζοντά με ἐν τῷ νόμῳ τῆς ἁμαρτίας, v. 23) represents the ultimate burden of the Law—its ability to define righteousness without enabling righteous living.
The burden of the Law described in Romans 7 corresponds to Paul's statement in Galatians 3:10 that "all who rely on works of the law are under a curse" because perfect obedience is required but humanly impossible. Similarly, at the Jerusalem Council, Peter described the Law as "a yoke on the neck of the disciples that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear" (Acts 15:10).
Resolving the Paradox in Romans 8
Paul resolves the paradox of the Law as both divine revelation and human burden in Romans 8, which introduces the transformative power of the Spirit. The chapter begins with the declaration that "there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus" because "the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death" (8:1-2). This freedom does not abolish the Law but fulfills it through new means: "For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit" (8:3-4).
This resolution maintains both the Law's goodness and the recognition of its limitations. The problem lay not in the Law itself (which was "weakened by the flesh," ἠσθένει διὰ τῆς σαρκός) but in humanity's inability to fulfill it. God's solution in Christ does not abolish the Law's "righteous requirement" (τὸ δικαίωμα τοῦ νόμου) but provides a new means for its fulfillment—the indwelling Spirit rather than human effort.
Thomas Schreiner effectively summarizes this paradox: "The law is God's good gift, but when it encounters human rebellion, it functions to provoke sin and pronounce judgment. The law is both holy and a cause of death, not because of any defect in the law but because of the sinfulness of human beings." This nuanced understanding preserves both the Law's divine character and Paul's insistence that believers are "not under law but under grace" (Rom 6:14).
Second Temple Jewish Perspectives on the Law
Paul's complex view of the Law as both divine gift and potential burden reflects diverse perspectives within Second Temple Judaism. Rather than a monolithic "Jewish view" against which Paul reacted, evidence suggests various understandings of Torah within Judaism of this period.
The Dead Sea Scrolls reveal one perspective within Second Temple Judaism. The Community Rule (1QS) emphasizes rigorous observance of the Law, stating that community members must "do what is good and right before Him, as He commanded through Moses and all His servants the prophets" (1QS 1:2-3). However, the Qumran community also recognized human inability to perfectly fulfill the Law, acknowledging that "man's way is not his own" and that righteousness comes "only by God's spirit" (1QS 11:10-12). This recognition parallels Paul's emphasis on the Spirit as the means of fulfilling the Law's requirements.
4QMMT (Miqsat Ma'ase ha-Torah, "Some Precepts of the Torah") provides evidence for the phrase "works of the law" (מעשי התורה, ma'asei ha-torah) within Jewish discourse. This text emphasizes specific halakhic practices (particularly regarding purity and sacrifice) as boundary markers for the community. The concluding section states: "We have written to you so that you might understand the Book of Moses and the books of the Prophets and David... remember the kings of Israel and reflect on their deeds, how whoever among them respected the Torah was saved from troubles" (4QMMT C 9-13). While emphasizing the importance of observing specific legal precepts, the text simultaneously recognizes that complete observance was difficult, requiring divine mercy.
Philo of Alexandria represents a Hellenistic Jewish approach to Torah. He presents the Law as reflecting eternal principles of reason (logos) while also requiring literal observance. In On the Migration of Abraham, Philo writes: "There are some who, regarding laws as symbols of intelligible realities, are over-punctilious about the latter while treating the former with casual indifference. Such persons I would blame for handling the matter with too light a touch. They ought to have given careful attention to both aims, both to the more exact investigation of the unseen meaning and to the blameless observance of the visible" (Migr. 89-90). This dual emphasis on both literal observance and deeper meaning parallels aspects of Paul's approach, though Paul's christological focus transforms the relationship between symbol and reality.
The Wisdom of Solomon, composed in the late first century BCE or early first century CE, presents the Law as God's wisdom given uniquely to Israel: "You have commanded me to build a temple on your holy mountain, and an altar in the city of your habitation, a copy of the holy tent that you prepared from the beginning" (Wis 9:8). The text celebrates the Law while recognizing human weakness: "For a perishable body weighs down the soul, and this earthy tent burdens the thoughtful mind" (Wis 9:15). This acknowledgment of tension between divine wisdom and human limitation parallels Paul's argument in Romans 7.
4 Ezra, though composed after Paul's writings (c. 100 CE), reflects traditions likely circulating earlier. The text portrays Ezra lamenting Israel's inability to keep the Law perfectly: "O sovereign Lord, from every forest of the earth and all its trees you have chosen one vine... And from all the lands of the world you have chosen one region... And from all the flowers of the world you have chosen one lily... Why have you handed the one over to the many, and dishonored the one root beyond the others?" (4 Ezra 5:23-28). God responds by affirming both the Law's goodness and human responsibility: "For the world has been created for the sake of many, but the future world for the sake of few... For many have been created, but few will be saved" (8:1-3). This tension between divine revelation and human inability parallels Paul's analysis, though Paul resolves it through Christ rather than through the salvation of an elect remnant.
These diverse Jewish perspectives demonstrate that Paul's recognition of both the Law's divine origin and its limitations in a fallen world was not a rejection of Judaism but a particular development within Jewish theological discourse. Paul's distinctive contribution lay in his christological reinterpretation of the Law's role in salvation history.
Theological Synthesis: The Law as Divine Revelation and Burden
Paul's portrayal of the Law as simultaneously divine revelation and human burden in Romans 7 reveals a sophisticated theological understanding that transcends simplistic categorizations. Several key insights emerge from this analysis:
First, Paul maintains a critical distinction between the Law itself and its effects when encountered by sinful humanity. The Law is "holy, righteous, and good" in its essence, yet it becomes an instrument of death when sin exploits it. This distinction allows Paul to affirm both the Law's divine origin and its limited efficacy.
Second, Paul understands the Law's limitations salvation-historically rather than essentially. The problem lies not in the Law's inherent nature but in its historical position before the coming of Christ and the Spirit. Romans 8:3-4 clarifies that what the Law "could not do, weakened by the flesh" God accomplished through Christ, "in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit." The Law's inability was temporary and contextual, not permanent and intrinsic.
Third, Paul's analysis reveals the Law's pedagogical function—revealing sin's true nature by displaying its power to corrupt even what is good. As Romans 7:13 states, sin used the good commandment "in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the commandment might become sinful beyond measure." This unmasking of sin prepares the way for the revelation of grace in Christ.
Fourth, Paul's complex "I" in Romans 7 suggests that the Law's function as both revelation and burden operates at multiple levels—individual, corporate, and salvation-historical. The divided self portrayed in Romans 7:14-25 reflects both personal moral struggle and the broader human condition under sin, as well as Israel's historical experience under Torah.
Finally, Paul's resolution in Romans 8 suggests that the Law's "righteous requirement" (δικαίωμα/dikaiōma) continues to express God's will even as its function changes under the new covenant. Believers fulfill this requirement not through autonomous obedience to external commands but through the transformative power of the indwelling Spirit.
This nuanced understanding allows Paul to maintain both continuity and discontinuity with Torah. The discontinuity lies not in the Law's content or divine origin but in its function and the means of its fulfillment. As N.T. Wright observes, "Paul's negative statements about the law refer not to the law's purpose—it was designed to give life—but to its effect; unable to overcome the power of sin, it ended up imprisoning everything under sin (Galatians 3:21-22)." This distinction enables Paul to affirm that through faith "we uphold the law" (Romans 3:31) even while declaring believers "not under law but under grace" (Romans 6:14).
Case Study 2: Galatians 3:15-25 and the Law as Revealing Sin
Exegetical Analysis of Galatians 3:15-25
Galatians 3:15-25 presents one of Paul's most sustained arguments about the historical and theological relationship between the Abrahamic promise and the Mosaic Law. This passage appears within Paul's broader defense of justification by faith against teachers insisting that Gentile believers must observe the Law (particularly circumcision) to be fully included in God's covenant people. In this section, Paul employs multiple argumentative strategies—appeal to common human practices, salvation-historical reasoning, allegorical interpretation, and scriptural exegesis—to demonstrate the Law's temporary and provisional role.
The passage begins with an appeal to human analogy: "Brothers and sisters, I speak in human terms: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified" (3:15). The phrase κατὰ ἄνθρωπον λέγω (kata anthrōpon legō, "I speak according to human [practice]") introduces an argument from common experience about the binding nature of covenants or wills (διαθήκη/diathēkē can mean either). Paul's point is that once a covenant is established, it cannot be unilaterally modified—a principle he will apply to the relationship between promise and Law.
In verses 16-18, Paul offers a creative exegesis of the Abrahamic covenant, focusing on a grammatical detail: "Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, 'And to offsprings,' referring to many, but referring to one, 'And to your offspring,' who is Christ" (3:16). Paul here interprets the singular form of "seed" (σπέρμα/sperma) in Genesis 13:15; 17:8; 24:7 (LXX) as referring specifically to Christ rather than to multiple descendants. While modern scholars note that "seed/offspring" is a collective singular in Hebrew (זֶרַע/zera) that can refer to multiple descendants, Paul's interpretation reflects Jewish exegetical practices that found significance in grammatical details.
Building on this interpretation, Paul establishes a chronological priority: "This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void" (3:17). The temporal relation between promise and Law becomes central to Paul's argument. The 430-year period likely refers to the time from Abraham to the Exodus (cf. Exod 12:40 LXX), though the precise calculation is not essential to Paul's point. What matters is the sequence: God established the covenant of promise with Abraham first, and the Law came significantly later.
In verse 18, Paul presents an either/or logical argument: "For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise." The conditional clause (εἰ γάρ... οὐκέτι/ei gar... ouketi) establishes mutual exclusivity between law and promise as means of obtaining the inheritance. The verb κεχάρισται (kecharistai, "gave as a gift") emphasizes the gratuitous nature of God's promise, contrasting with any merit-based understanding of the inheritance.
This raises an obvious question, which Paul anticipates: "Why then the law?" (τί οὖν ὁ νόμος; 3:19). If the inheritance comes through promise rather than Law, what purpose does the Law serve? Paul provides a complex answer: "It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made, and it was put in place through angels by an intermediary" (3:19b).
Several elements in this response require careful analysis. First, the phrase τῶν παραβάσεων χάριν (tōn parabaseōn charin, "because of transgressions") could mean either: (1) to restrain transgressions; (2) to define or reveal transgressions; or (3) to provoke transgressions. The broader context of Galatians and Paul's statements in Romans 5:20 and 7:7-13 suggest the second or third meanings—the Law serves to make sin recognizable as transgression or even to intensify it.
Second, Paul emphasizes the Law's temporal limitation: ἄχρις οὗ ἔλθῃ τὸ σπέρμα (achris hou elthē to sperma, "until the offspring should come"). This explicit temporality presents the Law as an interim measure between promise and fulfillment, not as a permanent institution. The "offspring" (σπέρμα) refers back to Christ (v.16), establishing his coming as the Law's terminus.
Third, Paul notes the Law's mediated delivery "through angels by an intermediary" (διαταγεὶς δι᾽ ἀγγέλων ἐν χειρὶ μεσίτου). This reference draws on Jewish traditions about angelic involvement in the giving of the Law (cf. Deut 33:2 LXX; Acts 7:38, 53; Heb 2:2) and Moses' role as mediator. In verse 20, Paul contrasts this mediated delivery with God's direct action: "Now an intermediary implies more than one, but God is one." This cryptic statement—which has generated numerous interpretations—appears to emphasize the directness of God's promise to Abraham compared to the more complex mediation of the Law, suggesting the promise's superiority.
In verses 21-22, Paul addresses another potential objection: "Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law. But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe." The emphatic μὴ γένοιτο (mē genoito, "certainly not!") rejects any fundamental opposition between Law and promise. The conditional statement in verse 21b implies that the Law's limitation lies not in its content but in its inability to "give life" (ζῳοποιῆσαι/zōopoiēsai)—to transform human nature and overcome sin.
Verse 22 introduces a striking metaphor: Scripture (ἡ γραφή/hē graphē, likely referring to the Law) has "imprisoned everything under sin" (συνέκλεισεν τὰ πάντα ὑπὸ ἁμαρτίαν/synekleisen ta panta hypo hamartian). The verb συγκλείω (synkleiō) suggests confining or enclosing, creating an image of universal captivity to sin—a condition the Law reveals and defines but cannot overcome. This imprisonment serves a purpose: "so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe." The Law's function in revealing universal sinfulness prepares for the revelation of grace through faith.
Verses 23-25 develop this salvation-historical framework through the metaphor of the Law as a παιδαγωγός (paidagōgos): "Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian."
The term παιδαγωγός (typically translated as "guardian," "custodian," or "disciplinarian") referred in Greco-Roman society to a slave responsible for supervising a child's behavior and escorting him to school—a temporary role that ended when the child reached maturity. This carefully chosen metaphor communicates both the Law's legitimate authority and its temporary function. As N.T. Wright observes, "The paidagōgos had a definite and important function, but it was strictly limited in time. When the young master came of age, the slave's task was finished."
The temporal markers in this passage—"before faith came" (πρὸ τοῦ ἐλθεῖν τὴν πίστιν), "until the coming faith" (εἰς τὴν μέλλουσαν πίστιν), "until Christ came" (εἰς Χριστόν), "now that faith has come" (ἐλθούσης δὲ τῆς πίστεως)—establish a decisive salvation-historical shift. The Law's guardianship belonged to a particular period that has now ended with Christ's coming. Believers are "no longer under a guardian" (οὐκέτι ὑπὸ παιδαγωγόν) because they have reached spiritual maturity through faith in Christ.
Throughout this passage, Paul develops a carefully constructed salvation-historical framework that acknowledges the Law's divine origin and legitimate role while insisting on its temporal limitation. The Law served a necessary purpose in revealing sin and maintaining Israel's identity "until Christ came," but it has now fulfilled that purpose. Believers relate to God primarily through the Abrahamic covenant of promise, fulfilled in Christ, rather than through the Mosaic covenant of Law.
The Law's Function in Revealing Sin
Paul's argument in Galatians 3:15-25 presents one of the Law's primary functions as revealing, defining, and even intensifying sin. This diagnostic role appears most explicitly in 3:19, where Paul states that the Law "was added because of transgressions" (τῶν παραβάσεων χάριν προσετέθη). While this phrase could have multiple meanings, the context suggests that the Law serves to transform sin into conscious transgression by establishing clear boundaries.
This understanding aligns with Paul's more extensive discussion in Romans 7:7-13, where he states, "If it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin... sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness." The Law brings latent sin to the surface, making it recognizable and defining its scope. As James D.G. Dunn observes, "One of the law's most fundamental functions for Paul was to define what is right and wrong, to specify what constitutes transgression, to identify sin as sin."
Paul develops this concept further in Romans 5:20: "The law came in to increase the trespass" (νόμος δὲ παρεισῆλθεν ἵνα πλεονάσῃ τὸ παράπτωμα). The conjunction ἵνα (hina, "in order that") suggests this was the Law's intended function, not merely an unintended consequence. By defining boundaries and prohibitions, the Law paradoxically intensifies sin's power. As Beverly Roberts Gaventa explains, "The law does not simply reveal sin; it actually plays into sin's hands by providing opportunities for transgressions to multiply."
This intensification occurs through multiple mechanisms. First, prohibition creates psychological arousal toward the forbidden object, as Paul notes in Romans 7:8: "sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness." Second, the Law creates accountability through knowledge: "where there is no law there is no transgression" (Rom 4:15) and "sin is not counted where there is no law" (Rom 5:13). Third, the Law exposes the depths of human rebellion against God, revealing that sin is not merely ignorance but active opposition to divine will.
In Galatians 3:22, Paul employs a striking metaphor to describe this function: "the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin" (συνέκλεισεν ἡ γραφὴ τὰ πάντα ὑπὸ ἁμαρτίαν). The verb συγκλείω (synkleiō, "to confine together") suggests not merely diagnosis but confinement—the Law locks humanity in a prison of recognized sinfulness from which it cannot escape through its own efforts. This universal imprisonment serves a purpose: "so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe."
This teleological understanding—the Law reveals sin in order to prepare for grace—appears throughout Paul's letters. Romans 11:32 states that "God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all." Galatians 3:24 describes the Law as a "guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith." The Law's role in revealing sin creates the context for understanding Christ's redemptive work.
Paul's diagnosis also appears in his understanding of the "curse of the law" in Galatians 3:10-13. Drawing on Deuteronomy 27:26, Paul argues that "all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, 'Cursed be everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them.'" The Law pronounces a curse on those who fail to observe it completely—which, in Paul's view, includes everyone. Christ's redemptive work addresses precisely this curse: "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us" (Gal 3:13).
This understanding of the Law's diagnostic function finds parallels in certain strands of Second Temple Judaism. The Dead Sea Scrolls community recognized human inability to perfectly fulfill the Law, acknowledging that "to God alone belongs righteousness... but to the sons of man belongs iniquity and sinful deeds" (1QS 11:9-10). The Hodayot (Thanksgiving Hymns) express a similar sentiment: "As for me, I belong to evil humankind, to the assembly of wicked flesh; my iniquities, transgressions, and sins, together with the wickedness of my heart, belong to the assembly destined to be destroyed" (1QH 7:28-29).
However, Paul's understanding diverges from many Jewish perspectives in its radical solution. While recognizing the Law's diagnostic role, many Jewish texts emphasized repentance, atonement rituals, and renewed commitment to observance as the response to revealed sin. Paul, by contrast, sees the revelation of universal sinfulness as preparation for a new covenant based on faith in Christ rather than Law observance.
The Law as Temporary Guardian (παιδαγωγός)
One of Paul's most distinctive contributions to understanding the Law's function appears in Galatians 3:24-25, where he describes the Law as a παιδαγωγός (paidagōgos) "until Christ came." This metaphor, drawn from Greco-Roman household practice, provides crucial insight into Paul's salvation-historical framework.
The παιδαγωγός in ancient society was typically a trusted slave assigned to supervise a male child, accompany him to school, and oversee his moral development. This role combined elements of protection, discipline, and supervision. The παιδαγωγός exercised legitimate but limited authority that automatically ended when the child reached maturity (typically around age sixteen).
Several aspects of this metaphor illuminate Paul's understanding of the Law. First, the παιδαγωγός held temporary authority. No matter how strict or controlling, the guardian's role was inherently limited in duration. This temporal limitation aligns with Paul's emphasis throughout Galatians 3 on the Law as an interim measure "until the offspring should come" (3:19) and "until Christ came" (3:24).
Second, the παιδαγωγός supervised an immature child. By employing this metaphor, Paul characterizes the period under the Law as one of spiritual immaturity. This theme appears explicitly in Galatians 4:1-7, where Paul compares Israel under the Law to an heir who "is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything," because he remains "under guardians and managers until the date set by his father." This state of immaturity contrasts with the "adoption as sons" (υἱοθεσία/huiothesia) that believers receive in Christ.
Third, the παιδαγωγός maintained discipline through both instruction and punishment. This disciplinary function corresponds to Paul's understanding of the Law as revealing and condemning sin. The Law's strict demands and threatened punishments served to maintain Israel's distinct identity during a period of spiritual immaturity.
Fourth, a παιδαγωγός protected the child from harmful influences and guided him toward proper development. Despite its limitations, the Law performed a positive function in preserving Israel's identity and preparing for Christ's coming. As James D.G. Dunn observes, "The law was provided by God as protective custody for Israel. The purpose of the law was to keep Israel as God's holy people, restrained from falling into the ways of the nations, until the seed should come."
Finally, the παιδαγωγός relationship ended when the child reached maturity. Paul emphasizes this transition: "But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian" (3:25). The coming of Christ marks the end of the Law's guardianship function and the beginning of a new relationship based on mature sonship rather than supervised childhood.
This metaphor reveals that Paul understood the Law as both legitimate and limited. The Law's authority was divinely established but temporally restricted, designed for a specific phase in salvation history. With Christ's coming, that phase has ended, not because the Law failed but because it accomplished its preparatory purpose.
Historical Context: The Jerusalem Council
Paul's theological reflections on the Law's revelatory function and temporary status emerged within a specific historical context: the early church's debate about Gentile inclusion and Torah observance. Acts 15 records the Jerusalem Council (circa 48-50 CE), which addressed precisely this question. Several leaders, identified as "believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees," insisted that "it is necessary to circumcise [Gentile converts] and to order them to keep the law of Moses" (Acts 15:5).
Peter's response at the Council parallels Paul's theology in Galatians: "Now, therefore, why are you putting God to the test by placing a yoke on the neck of the disciples that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will" (Acts 15:10-11). This description of the Law as an unbearable "yoke" aligns with Paul's emphasis on the Law's inability to give life because of human weakness.
James's ruling at the Council established a middle position: Gentile believers would not be required to be circumcised or observe the full Torah but should abstain from "things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from strangled things, and from blood" (Acts 15:20). This compromise recognized both the Law's divine origin and its limited applicability to Gentile believers in the new covenant community.
Archaeological evidence suggests that tensions over these questions persisted throughout the first century. The Aphrodisias inscription (3rd century CE but likely reflecting earlier conditions) distinguishes between "Jews" and "God-fearers" (those who participated in synagogue life without full conversion) in a Jewish community of Asia Minor. This distinction parallels the situation Paul addressed, where Gentile believers were pressured to become full Jewish proselytes through circumcision and Torah observance.
The historical context reveals that Paul's theology of the Law developed not as abstract reflection but as a response to concrete community conflicts. His emphasis on the Law's diagnostic function and temporary guardianship addressed the specific question of whether Gentiles needed to observe Torah to be included in God's covenant people.
Theological Implications: The Purpose of the Law in Salvation History
Paul's understanding of the Law as revealing sin and serving as a temporary guardian yields several significant theological implications:
First, Paul's framework suggests a dynamic rather than static understanding of divine revelation. God's self-disclosure unfolds progressively through salvation history, with different covenantal arrangements serving different purposes at different times. The Law represented a crucial but interim stage in this progressive revelation, preparing for but not constituting the final word.
Second, Paul's emphasis on the Law's revelatory function challenges simplistic views of sin as mere transgression of rules. For Paul, sin represents a deeper power or condition that the Law exposes but cannot overcome. This diagnosis requires a solution beyond improved law-keeping—namely, the transformation of human nature through the Spirit.
Third, Paul's temporal limitation of the Law's function challenges supercessionist readings that simply discard the Old Testament as irrelevant. The Law remains "holy and righteous and good" (Rom 7:12) even as its covenantal function changes. As Thomas Schreiner observes, "Paul does not suggest that the Mosaic covenant was a mistake. Rather, it played a crucial role in salvation history in revealing sin, and thus showing the need for the promised seed, Jesus Christ."
Fourth, Paul's παιδαγωγός metaphor suggests that Christian freedom from the Law represents maturity rather than license. Those who have reached maturity in Christ no longer need external supervision but internalize the ethical principles previously enforced externally. This understanding aligns with Jeremiah's prophecy of the new covenant, where God's law would be written on hearts rather than tablets (Jer 31:31-34).
Finally, Paul's understanding of the Law's revelatory function provides theological grounding for the doctrine of justification by faith. If the Law's primary purpose was to expose universal sinfulness rather than provide a means of earning righteousness, then salvation must come through another means—faith in Christ. As Douglas Moo explains, "The law's ability to reveal, provoke, and condemn sin prepares the way for the gospel by making manifest the universal need for righteousness as a gift rather than achievement."
These theological implications demonstrate the sophisticated coherence of Paul's thought. The Law's revelatory and custodial functions form an integral part of his salvation-historical framework, connecting the Abrahamic promise, Mosaic covenant, and fulfillment in Christ into a unified divine plan.
Case Study 3: 2 Corinthians 3:1-18 and the Contrast Between Old and New Covenants
Exegetical Analysis of 2 Corinthians 3:1-18
In 2 Corinthians 3:1-18, Paul develops one of his most extended contrasts between the old and new covenants, using the imagery of "letter" versus "Spirit" and drawing on the Exodus narrative of Moses' veiled face. This passage appears within Paul's defense of his apostolic ministry against critics who questioned his authority and demanded letters of recommendation. Paul transforms this practical concern into a profound theological reflection on the nature of covenant ministry.
The passage begins with rhetorical questions establishing the context: "Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, as some do, letters of recommendation to you, or from you?" (3:1). Paul then presents the Corinthian believers themselves as his letter of recommendation: "You yourselves are our letter of recommendation, written on our hearts, to be known and read by all. And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts" (3:2-3).
This metaphor introduces several key contrasts that structure the entire passage: ink versus Spirit, stone tablets versus human hearts. The reference to "tablets of stone" (πλαξὶν λιθίναις/plaxin lithinais) clearly evokes the Sinai covenant, where God wrote the Ten Commandments on stone tablets (Exod 31:18; 34:1). By contrast, the "Spirit of the living God" writing on "human hearts" evokes Jeremiah's prophecy of the new covenant: "I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts" (Jer 31:33) and Ezekiel's promise: "I will give you a new heart... I will put my Spirit within you" (Ezek 36:26-27).
In verses 4-6, Paul explicitly connects this contrast to his ministry: "Such is the confidence that we have through Christ toward God. Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God, who has made us sufficient to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life."
The phrase "ministers of a new covenant" (διακόνους καινῆς διαθήκης/diakonous kainēs diathēkēs) directly identifies Paul's ministry with Jeremiah's prophesied new covenant (Jer 31:31-34). The contrast between "letter" (γράμμα/gramma) and "Spirit" (πνεῦμα/pneuma) introduces a fundamental distinction that organizes the remainder of the passage. The stark statement "the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life" (τὸ γὰρ γράμμα ἀποκτέννει, τὸ δὲ πνεῦμα ζῳοποιεῖ) establishes the transformative power of the new covenant over the old.
In verses 7-11, Paul develops an extended comparison between the glory of the old and new covenants:
"Now if the ministry of death, carved in letters on stone, came with such glory that the Israelites could not gaze at Moses' face because of its glory, which was being brought to an end, will not the ministry of the Spirit have even more glory? For if there was glory in the ministry of condemnation, the ministry of righteousness must far exceed it in glory. Indeed, in this case, what once had glory has come to have no glory at all, because of the glory that surpasses it. For if what was being brought to an end came with glory, much more will what is permanent have glory."
This comparative argument employs a fortiori reasoning (arguing from lesser to greater): if the old covenant, despite its limitations, came with glory, how much more glorious must the new covenant be? Several features of this comparison merit careful attention.
First, Paul characterizes the old covenant as "the ministry of death" (ἡ διακονία τοῦ θανάτου/hē diakonia tou thanatou) and "the ministry of condemnation" (ἡ διακονία τῆς κατακρίσεως/hē diakonia tēs katakriseōs). These descriptions align with his analysis in Romans 7:5-11 and Galatians 3:10-12, where the Law pronounces condemnation on those who fail to observe it perfectly. By contrast, the new covenant is "the ministry of the Spirit" and "the ministry of righteousness," emphasizing its life-giving and justifying power.
Second, Paul introduces a temporal contrast between what is "being brought to an end" (καταργουμένην/katargoumenēn) and what is "permanent" (μένον/menon). The present participle καταργουμένην suggests a process of obsolescence rather than abrupt termination—the old covenant's glory is fading rather than suddenly abolished. This temporal dimension becomes central to Paul's interpretation of the Moses narrative in verses 12-18.
Third, Paul acknowledges the genuine, God-given glory of the old covenant even while asserting the superior glory of the new. The comparative structure ("more glory," "far exceed," "glory that surpasses") maintains continuity between the covenants while emphasizing development and escalation. As Scott Hafemann observes, "Paul does not deny the glory of the old covenant but places it in salvation-historical perspective as preparatory for and surpassed by the new."
In verses 12-18, Paul develops this contrast through a creative interpretation of Exodus 34:29-35, the account of Moses' veiled face after encountering God:
"Since we have such a hope, we are very bold, not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face so that the Israelites might not gaze at the outcome of what was being brought to an end. But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away. Yes, to this day whenever Moses is read a veil lies over their hearts. But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit."
Paul's interpretation departs from a straightforward reading of Exodus 34, where Moses veiled his face to prevent the Israelites from being afraid of his radiance. In Paul's reading, the veil prevents Israel from seeing "the outcome of what was being brought to an end" (τὸ τέλος τοῦ καταργουμένου/to telos tou katargoumenou), suggesting the temporary nature of the old covenant's glory. This interpretive move transforms the historical narrative into a salvation-historical parable about covenant relationships.
The "veil" (κάλυμμα/kalymma) becomes a metaphor for spiritual obstruction that prevents recognition of Christ as the fulfillment of the Law. This veil remains "to this day" (ἄχρι τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας/achri tēs sēmeron hēmeras) when the old covenant is read, but "when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed" (ἡνίκα δὲ ἐὰν ἐπιστρέψῃ πρὸς κύριον, περιαιρεῖται τὸ κάλυμμα). The passive verb περιαιρεῖται (periaireitai, "is removed") suggests divine action in unveiling, a theological point Paul develops in verse 18.
The declaration "the Lord is the Spirit" (ὁ δὲ κύριος τὸ πνεῦμά ἐστιν) connects the removal of the veil to the life-giving Spirit mentioned in verse 6. This connection creates a theological framework where encountering Christ through the Spirit removes obstructions to understanding the Scriptures and enables transformation "from one degree of glory to another" (ἀπὸ δόξης εἰς δόξαν/apo doxēs eis doxan).
The passage concludes with the transformative outcome of unveiled encounter with divine glory: believers are "being transformed into the same image" (τὴν αὐτὴν εἰκόνα μεταμορφούμεθα/tēn autēn eikona metamorphoumetha). The passive verb μεταμορφούμεθα suggests divine agency in this transformation, which Paul attributes to "the Lord who is the Spirit" (κυρίου πνεύματος/kyriou pneumatos). This transformative outcome contrasts implicitly with the Law's inability to transform those under its authority.
Throughout this passage, Paul develops a sophisticated contrast between old and new covenants while maintaining their connection within salvation history. The old covenant, though genuinely glorious, was characterized by external inscription, condemnation, temporality, and veiled understanding. The new covenant surpasses it through internal inscription by the Spirit, righteousness, permanence, and unveiled transformation. This contrast serves Paul's immediate purpose of defending his apostolic ministry while establishing a theological framework for understanding the relationship between Mosaic Law and the gospel.
Letter and Spirit: Paul's Hermeneutical Framework
Paul's contrast between "letter" (γράμμα/gramma) and "Spirit" (πνεῦμα/pneuma) in 2 Corinthians 3:6 provides a hermeneutical framework for understanding his approach to the Scriptures and the Law. The statement "the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life" has sometimes been misinterpreted as endorsing allegorical or non-literal interpretation over literal reading. However, closer analysis reveals a more nuanced understanding related to covenant dynamics rather than interpretive methods.
Several key observations clarify Paul's meaning. First, the term γράμμα (gramma, "letter") in Paul's usage typically refers not to literal interpretation but to the written code of the Law apart from the transforming power of the Spirit. In Romans 2:27-29, Paul contrasts circumcision "by the letter" with circumcision "of the heart, by the Spirit," indicating that γράμμα represents external compliance with written requirements. In Romans 7:6, believers are released from the Law to serve "in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code (γράμματος/grammatos)." These parallels suggest that in 2 Corinthians 3:6, "letter" refers to the Law as written code rather than to literal interpretation.
Second, the contrast between killing and life-giving reflects Paul's understanding of the Law's function as revealing sin and pronouncing condemnation. As Romans 7:9-11 states, "when the commandment came, sin came alive and I died. The very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me." The Law "kills" not because of deficiency in its content but because it confronts human sinfulness with demands that sinful humanity cannot fulfill, resulting in condemnation. By contrast, the Spirit "gives life" by enabling internal transformation that fulfills the Law's righteous requirement (Rom 8:4).
Third, the broader context of 2 Corinthians 3 connects this contrast to covenant dynamics rather than interpretive methods. The "letter" corresponds to the "ministry of death, carved in letters on stone" (3:7) and the "ministry of condemnation" (3:9), clearly identifying it with the Sinai covenant. The "Spirit" corresponds to the "ministry of righteousness" (3:9) associated with the new covenant. This covenant-historical framework suggests that Paul is contrasting different modes of divine-human relationship rather than different approaches to textual interpretation.
From these observations, Paul's "letter" versus "Spirit" contrast establishes a hermeneutical framework with several dimensions:
First, it distinguishes between external compliance and internal transformation. The "letter" represents the Law as external code requiring obedience without providing transformative power. The "Spirit" represents the internalization of divine will through the indwelling presence of God, fulfilling Jeremiah's prophecy that under the new covenant, God would write the Law on hearts rather than tablets (Jer 31:33).
Second, it contrasts condemnation with enabling righteousness. The "letter" pronounces judgment on all who fail to observe its requirements perfectly. The "Spirit" enables believers to fulfill the "righteous requirement of the law" (Rom 8:4) through transformative power rather than mere demand.
Third, it establishes a salvation-historical movement from temporary to permanent covenant arrangements. The "letter" corresponds to what is "being brought to an end" (καταργουμένην/katargoumenēn), while the Spirit represents what is "permanent" (μένον/menon). This temporal framework places both covenants within a unified divine purpose unfolding across history.
Finally, it provides a christological hermeneutic for reading Scripture. The "veil" that obscures proper understanding is removed "only through Christ" (ἐν Χριστῷ καταργεῖται/en Christō katargeitai, 3:14), suggesting that Christ provides the interpretive key for understanding the Law and Prophets.
This framework does not abandon the historical meaning of the Law but reinterprets it from a new covenant perspective. As Richard Hays explains, "Paul's hermeneutic does not discard the 'letter' of Scripture but discerns how it points forward to Christ as its τέλος (telos, 'goal' or 'fulfillment')." The Spirit's illumination does not replace careful attention to the text but enables recognition of its fulfillment in Christ.
Paul's hermeneutical framework has been variously understood across Christian tradition. Augustine famously appropriated the "letter/Spirit" contrast in De spiritu et littera, understanding it as the distinction between the Law that commands and the Spirit that enables obedience. Luther emphasized the contrast between the Law that condemns and the Gospel that justifies, while Calvin developed the concept of the Spirit's internal testimony that brings the written word to life in believers.
In contemporary scholarship, the "letter/Spirit" contrast has been interpreted through various lenses. Richard Hays and others emphasize its salvation-historical dimension, seeing it as marking the transition from one covenant age to another. N.T. Wright connects it to Paul's understanding of exile and restoration, with the Spirit representing the long-awaited return from exile prophesied by Ezekiel and Jeremiah. David Starling suggests that Paul develops a "hermeneutic of faith" where Christ functions as the interpretive key for understanding Israel's scriptures.
These varied interpretations reflect the multidimensional nature of Paul's contrast. Rather than a simplistic opposition between literalism and spiritualization, Paul establishes a nuanced framework for understanding how the same divine revelation functions differently under different covenant arrangements. This framework embraces both continuity (the same God speaking in both covenants) and discontinuity (the transformed relationship made possible through Christ and the Spirit).
Veiled Glory: Paul's Reinterpretation of Exodus 34
Paul's creative interpretation of the Moses narrative in Exodus 34:29-35 merits detailed analysis, as it reveals his hermeneutical approach to Israel's scriptures and his understanding of the relationship between covenants. In the original Exodus account, Moses descended from Sinai with his face radiating divine glory after communing with God. The Israelites were afraid to approach him because of this radiance, so Moses veiled his face when speaking with the people but removed the veil when speaking with God.
Paul's interpretation in 2 Corinthians 3:12-18 introduces several significant modifications to this narrative:
First, Paul reframes the purpose of Moses' veil. In the Exodus account, Moses veiled his face because the Israelites were afraid of its radiance (Exod 34:30). In Paul's interpretation, Moses veiled his face "so that the Israelites might not gaze at the outcome of what was being brought to an end" (πρὸς τὸ μὴ ἀτενίσαι τοὺς υἱοὺς Ἰσραὴλ εἰς τὸ τέλος τοῦ καταργουμένου, 2 Cor 3:13). This interpretation adds a new dimension: the veil conceals the fading nature of the covenant's glory, a concept not present in the original narrative.
Second, Paul extends the veil metaphor beyond Moses to Israel's ongoing experience: "But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted" (3:14). This extension transforms the historical veil into a symbol of spiritual obstruction that prevents recognition of Christ as the fulfillment of the Law.
Third, Paul introduces a christological resolution to this veiling: "because only through Christ is it taken away" (ὅτι ἐν Χριστῷ καταργεῖται, 3:14). The verb καταργεῖται (katargeitai, "is abolished") corresponds to the terminology used for the fading glory of the old covenant, suggesting that Christ both fulfills what the Law pointed toward and removes the obstruction that prevents recognition of this fulfillment.
Fourth, Paul connects the removal of the veil to turning to the Lord: "But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed" (3:16). This statement adapts Exodus 34:34 ("whenever Moses went in before the LORD to speak with him, he would remove the veil") but changes its referent from Moses to anyone who turns to the Lord. This universalizing move transforms the unique experience of Moses into a paradigm for all believers.
These interpretive moves reveal Paul's sophisticated hermeneutical approach. Rather than simply allegorizing the text or dismissing its historical meaning, Paul discerns within the narrative a pattern that anticipates the relationship between old and new covenants. As Scott Hafemann observes, "Paul does not abandon the historical meaning of Exodus 34 but finds within it a typological pattern that applies to the current situation."
Paul's interpretation aligns with Jewish exegetical practices of his time while introducing christological innovations. The technique of drawing contemporary application from scriptural narratives appears in the pesher interpretations at Qumran, where texts like Habakkuk were read as directly addressing the community's experience. Paul's reframing of narrative details to highlight specific theological points resembles midrashic methods that found significance in every aspect of the biblical text.
However, Paul's christological focus distinguishes his interpretation from other Jewish approaches. His understanding of Christ as both the fulfillment of what the Law anticipated and the means of removing obstructions to properly understanding the Law introduces a hermeneutical framework not present in non-Christian Jewish interpretation. This framework does not reject the Law but reads it through the lens of its fulfillment in Christ.
Paul's interpretation of the veiled glory serves his broader theological purpose of demonstrating the relative positions of the old and new covenants in salvation history. The old covenant possessed authentic divine glory, but that glory was partial, fading, and ultimately preparatory for the permanent and transformative glory revealed in Christ. This understanding maintains both the divine origin of the Law and its subordinate position relative to the gospel.
Glory to Glory: The Transformative New Covenant
The climax of 2 Corinthians 3 presents the transformative outcome of the new covenant: "And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit" (3:18). This declaration encapsulates Paul's understanding of the new covenant's distinctive power in contrast to the old.
Several elements in this verse merit careful attention. First, the phrase "we all" (ἡμεῖς δὲ πάντες/hēmeis de pantes) emphasizes the universal accessibility of this transformation. Unlike Moses, who alone experienced unveiled communion with God, all believers under the new covenant enjoy unmediated access to divine glory. This democratization of religious experience contrasts with the hierarchical structure of Sinai, where the people remained at a distance while Moses alone approached God.
Second, the "unveiled face" (ἀνακεκαλυμμένῳ προσώπῳ/anakekalymmenō prosōpō) contrasts with the veiled face of Moses and symbolizes the direct encounter with God made possible through Christ. The perfect passive participle ἀνακεκαλυμμένῳ suggests a completed action with ongoing results—the veil has been permanently removed, enabling sustained communion.
Third, the activity of "beholding" (κατοπτριζόμενοι/katoptrizomenoi) has been variously interpreted. The verb κατοπτρίζομαι can mean either "to behold as in a mirror" or "to reflect like a mirror." If the former, believers gaze upon Christ's glory; if the latter, they reflect that glory to others. The context suggests both meanings may apply: believers both contemplate Christ's glory and radiate it to the world, fulfilling Israel's vocation to be a light to the nations.
Fourth, the process of being "transformed" (μεταμορφούμεθα/metamorphoumetha) into the "same image" (τὴν αὐτὴν εἰκόνα/tēn autēn eikona) indicates profound ontological change rather than mere external conformity. This transformation fulfills the human vocation to bear God's image (Gen 1:26-27) and anticipates the eschatological conformity to Christ's image in Romans 8:29. The present tense of μεταμορφούμεθα suggests an ongoing process rather than instantaneous change—believers progressively become more Christlike through continued exposure to divine glory.
Fifth, the phrase "from glory to glory" (ἀπὸ δόξης εἰς δόξαν/apo doxēs eis doxan) indicates both the source and destination of transformation. Whether this means "from the Lord's glory to our glory" or "from one degree of glory to another," it establishes a trajectory of increasing conformity to Christ through progressive transformation.
Finally, the declaration that this transformation comes "from the Lord who is the Spirit" (ἀπὸ κυρίου πνεύματος/apo kyriou pneumatos) identifies the divine agent of change. The ambiguous phrase κυρίου πνεύματος may mean "the Lord who is the Spirit" or "the Spirit of the Lord," but either reading establishes that transformation occurs through divine agency rather than human effort.
This portrait of transformation provides the positive counterpart to Paul's critique of the Law. While the Law could define righteousness and diagnose sin, it could not transform sinners into righteous people. The new covenant accomplishes what the Law could not: internal transformation through the Spirit that progressively conforms believers to Christ's image. This transformative power fulfills Ezekiel's prophecy that God would "give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you" and "put my Spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes" (Ezek 36:26-27).
The concept of transformation "from glory to glory" also suggests continuity within development. The new covenant does not abolish what the old revealed but brings it to fulfillment through the Spirit's transformative power. As Gordon Fee observes, "For Paul, the Spirit both fulfills the Law by writing it on the heart and surpasses the Law by enabling a kind of righteousness that the Law prescribed but could not produce."
This understanding of transformation through beholding establishes a theological framework that integrates Christology, pneumatology, and soteriology. Christ reveals divine glory; the Spirit enables perception of and conformity to that glory; this transformative process constitutes salvation as progressive Christlikeness rather than mere legal acquittal. Such a framework transcends simplistic oppositions between "letter" and "Spirit" by recognizing the unified divine purpose underlying both covenants while affirming the superior efficacy of the new.
Second Temple Jewish Context: Covenant Renewal Expectations
Paul's contrast between old and new covenants emerges within a context of diverse Jewish expectations regarding covenant renewal and restoration. Various texts from the Second Temple period anticipated a new work of God that would transform Israel's relationship with God and the nations.
The prophetic promises of a "new covenant" (Jer 31:31-34) and a new work of God's Spirit (Ezek 36:26-27; Joel 2:28-29) formed the scriptural foundation for these expectations. However, these passages received varied interpretations within Second Temple Judaism.
The Dead Sea Scrolls community understood itself as already experiencing a form of covenant renewal. The Damascus Document states: "Those who remain steadfast in it shall acquire eternal life, and all the glory of Adam shall be theirs" (CD 3:20). The Community Rule describes the community as "an eternal planting, a temple for Israel, and mystery of the highest holiness for Aaron... a tested rampart, a precious cornerstone" (1QS 8:5-7). This self-understanding combined present experience of covenant renewal with anticipation of future restoration.
The sectarian texts from Qumran also emphasize the Spirit's role in covenant renewal. The Rule of the Community describes how God "will sprinkle upon him the spirit of truth like waters of purification" (1QS 4:21). The Hodayot (Thanksgiving Hymns) praise God because "thou hast shed thy Holy Spirit upon thy servant" (1QH 7:6-7). These passages parallel Paul's emphasis on the Spirit as the agent of transformation under the new covenant.
The Qumran community maintained this sense of covenant renewal while continuing to observe Torah. The Damascus Document emphasizes rigorous adherence to legal interpretations, suggesting that for this community, covenant renewal enhanced rather than replaced Torah observance. This perspective differs from Paul's understanding, which more sharply distinguishes the covenantal arrangements.
Apocalyptic texts like 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, though post-Pauline, likely reflect traditions circulating in the first century. These texts anticipate a more radical transition to what 4 Ezra calls "the new age" (4 Ezra 7:50) where "the heart of the earth's inhabitants shall be changed and converted to a different spirit" (4 Ezra 6:26). This expectation of cosmic transformation parallels aspects of Paul's new covenant theology, though with important differences in christological understanding.
In Hellenistic Judaism, Philo interprets covenant renewal in more philosophical terms. In On the Creation, he describes how "every good man has the Spirit of God dwelling within him" (Op. 134-135), suggesting ongoing divine indwelling that enables virtue. While Philo maintains commitment to Torah observance, he emphasizes internal transformation through divine inspiration—a concept that parallels aspects of Paul's pneumatological emphasis while differing in its christological framework.
The Testament of Levi, part of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs (dating is disputed but likely pre-Christian with Christian redactions), anticipates a priestly figure who will "execute a judgment of truth upon the earth" and through whom "the spirit of understanding and sanctification shall rest upon him" (T. Levi 18:7-9). This expectation of a Spirit-empowered mediator suggests traditions that could inform Paul's understanding of Christ's role in the new covenant.
These diverse Jewish perspectives demonstrate that Paul's new covenant theology emerges within a context of varied restoration expectations. His distinctive contribution lies not in the concept of covenant renewal itself but in identifying Jesus as the decisive agent of that renewal and the Spirit as the transformative power that writes God's law on believers' hearts. As N.T. Wright observes, "Paul's new covenant theology represents not a rejection of Judaism but a particular understanding of how Israel's restoration hopes are fulfilled in Christ."
Theological Synthesis: Continuity and Discontinuity Between Covenants
Paul's exposition in 2 Corinthians 3 presents a sophisticated theological framework for understanding the relationship between old and new covenants. This framework maintains both continuity and discontinuity, avoiding both supersessionist rejection of the Law and flat continuity that minimizes the transformative significance of Christ.
Several elements of continuity emerge in Paul's exposition. First, both covenants originate in divine revelation. Paul acknowledges the genuine glory of the Sinai covenant, describing it as "the ministry of God" delivered by Moses. The glory on Moses' face represented authentic divine disclosure, not deception or human invention. This affirmation maintains the unity of divine purpose across redemptive history.
Second, both covenants address the fundamental problem of estrangement from God. The Law established a covenant relationship between God and Israel, providing means of atonement and structures for communal holiness. The new covenant addresses the same essential need for reconciliation, though through transformed means.
Third, both covenants employ the same fundamental symbolic framework. Paul's imagery of stones versus hearts, external versus internal writing, and veiling versus unveiling all draw on conceptual patterns established in the Hebrew Scriptures. The new covenant fulfills and transforms these patterns rather than replacing them with unrelated concepts.
Fourth, both covenants aim at conformity to God's will. The Law prescribed righteous living; the Spirit enables it. As Paul states in Romans 8:4, God sent his Son "in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit." This statement maintains continuity of moral purpose while acknowledging the transformed means of fulfillment.
Alongside these elements of continuity, Paul emphasizes several dimensions of discontinuity. First, the covenants differ in their primary mode of operation. The old covenant functioned through external prescription, written on stone tablets; the new covenant operates through internal transformation, written on human hearts by the Spirit. This shift fulfills Jeremiah's prophecy of a covenant where God's law would be internalized rather than imposed externally.
Second, the covenants differ in their effects on those under their authority. The old covenant, encountered by sinful humanity, becomes "the ministry of death" and "the ministry of condemnation" because it defines righteousness without providing power to attain it. The new covenant, by contrast, is "the ministry of the Spirit" and "the ministry of righteousness" because it enables what it requires through transformative power.
Third, the covenants differ in their historical permanence. The old covenant was "being brought to an end" (καταργουμένην/katargoumenēn), while the new covenant is "permanent" (μένον/menon). This temporal distinction establishes the provisional nature of the Sinai covenant within God's unfolding purpose.
Fourth, the covenants differ in their degrees of glory. While both possess genuine divine glory, the new covenant has "much more" glory that "surpasses" the old. This comparative framework maintains the value of the old while emphasizing the surpassing significance of the new.
Finally, the covenants differ in the directness of access to God they provide. Under the old covenant, Moses alone experienced unveiled communion with God; under the new, "we all, with unveiled face" behold divine glory. This democratization of spiritual experience fulfills the promise in Joel 2:28-29 that God would pour out his Spirit on all flesh.
This framework of continuity and discontinuity avoids both extreme positions in understanding the relationship between covenants. Against radical discontinuity that simply discards the Law as irrelevant, Paul maintains the divine origin and genuine glory of the old covenant. Against flat continuity that sees Christianity as merely reformed Judaism, Paul emphasizes the transformative newness of what God has done in Christ and through the Spirit.
As Richard Hays summarizes, "Paul's hermeneutic neither dissolves the Law nor preserves it unchanged; rather, it discerns within the Law a witness to the gospel that can be rightly understood only when read in light of Christ's death and resurrection." This nuanced understanding allows Paul to both affirm that "Christ is the end (or goal) of the law" (Rom 10:4) and insist that "we uphold the law" through faith (Rom 3:31).
Case Study 4: Romans 10:4 and Christ as the τέλος of the Law
Exegetical Analysis of Romans 10:4
Romans 10:4 presents one of Paul's most concise yet profoundly significant statements about Christ's relationship to the Law: "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes" (τέλος γὰρ νόμου Χριστὸς εἰς δικαιοσύνην παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι). This declaration appears within Paul's extended discussion of Israel's place in God's redemptive plan (Romans 9-11), specifically addressing why many in Israel have not embraced the gospel message. The interpretive crux of this verse centers on the meaning of τέλος (telos), which can signify either "end" in the sense of termination or "goal/purpose/fulfillment."
The immediate context illuminates Paul's meaning. In Romans 10:1-3, Paul expresses deep concern for his fellow Israelites: "Brothers, my heart's desire and prayer to God for them is that they may be saved. For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. For, being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and seeking to establish their own, they did not submit to God's righteousness." This diagnosis identifies Israel's fundamental error as pursuing righteousness through "their own" means rather than submitting to "God's righteousness" now revealed in Christ.
Verse 4 begins with γάρ (gar, "for"), indicating that it provides the logical basis for the preceding analysis. The statement "Christ is the τέλος of the law" explains why Israel's zealous pursuit of the Law has not led to righteousness—they have missed the Law's orientation toward Christ. The phrase εἰς δικαιοσύνην (eis dikaiosynēn, "for righteousness") specifies the domain in which Christ is the Law's τέλος. The final phrase, παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι (panti tō pisteuonti, "to everyone who believes"), establishes faith as the means of receiving this righteousness.
The subsequent verses develop Paul's argument by contrasting two types of righteousness: one based on law-keeping, which requires perfect obedience ("the person who does the commandments shall live by them," 10:5, citing Lev 18:5), and one based on faith, which receives what God has accomplished in Christ (10:6-10). This contrast suggests that Christ's role as the τέλος of the Law involves providing a different path to righteousness than law-keeping.
The broader context of Romans further illuminates Paul's meaning. In Romans 3:21-22, Paul declares that "now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it—the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe." This earlier statement establishes two crucial points: (1) the righteousness now available in Christ comes "apart from the law" (χωρὶς νόμου/chōris nomou), and (2) paradoxically, "the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it" (μαρτυρουμένη ὑπὸ τοῦ νόμου καὶ τῶν προφητῶν/martyroumenē hypo tou nomou kai tōn prophētōn). These apparently contradictory claims suggest that Christ simultaneously fulfills what the Law anticipated and supersedes the Law as the means of attaining righteousness.
Similarly, in Romans 7:1-6, Paul employs the metaphor of marriage to explain that believers have "died to the law through the body of Christ" (7:4) and are "released from the law" (7:6), yet now serve in "the new way of the Spirit" rather than "the old way of the written code." This contrast between old and new ways suggests both discontinuity (release from the Law's jurisdiction) and continuity (continued service to God according to the Spirit).
Given these contextual indicators, how should we understand τέλος in Romans 10:4? Several major interpretations have been proposed:
Termination view: Christ is the end of the Law in the sense of its termination or abrogation as a covenant. This view emphasizes discontinuity, focusing on Paul's statements about believers being "released from the law" (Rom 7:6) and the Law being "our guardian until Christ came" (Gal 3:24-25).
Goal/purpose view: Christ is the goal or purpose toward which the Law was directed. This view emphasizes continuity, focusing on Paul's statement that "the Law and the Prophets bear witness to" the righteousness now revealed in Christ (Rom 3:21) and that through faith "we uphold the law" (Rom 3:31).
Culmination/fulfillment view: Christ is both the goal and the termination of the Law, bringing it to fulfillment while ending its role as covenant. This mediating view sees Paul's statements about both continuity and discontinuity as complementary rather than contradictory.
Lexical analysis provides important context for these interpretations. The term τέλος in Greek literature and the LXX can carry multiple meanings: (1) "end" or "termination" (1 Cor 15:24; 1 Pet 4:7); (2) "goal" or "purpose" (1 Tim 1:5; Jas 5:11); (3) "outcome" or "result" (Rom 6:21); (4) "fulfillment" or "completion" (Luke 22:37); and (5) "tax" or "tribute" (Matt 17:25; Rom 13:7). These varied meanings suggest semantic flexibility rather than rigid definition.
In Paul's usage elsewhere, τέλος appears with different senses in different contexts. In Romans 6:21-22, it refers to the "outcome" or "result" of different kinds of service: "The end [τέλος] of those things is death... now... you have your fruit leading to sanctification and its end [τέλος], eternal life." In 1 Corinthians 15:24, it clearly means "end" in the sense of termination: "Then comes the end [τέλος], when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father." In 1 Timothy 1:5 (if Pauline), it means "goal" or "purpose": "The aim [τέλος] of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart."
This semantic range suggests that the meaning of τέλος in Romans 10:4 must be determined by context rather than lexical definition alone. The contextual indicators examined above suggest that the culmination/fulfillment view best accounts for Paul's varied statements about the Law. Christ is the τέλος of the Law in that he both fulfills what the Law anticipated and transforms its function in the lives of believers. As Douglas Moo concludes, "τέλος includes both the idea that Christ is the 'goal' of the law (in the sense of being the object to which the law pointed) and the idea that Christ is the 'termination' of the law (in the sense of bringing to an end the law as a way of salvation)."
Law and Promise in Pauline Theology
The relationship between Law and promise forms a central theme in Paul's theology, particularly in Romans and Galatians. Paul consistently presents the promise to Abraham as both chronologically and theologically prior to the Law, establishing a framework for understanding how Christ fulfills both while transforming the function of the Law.
In Galatians 3:15-18, Paul emphasizes the temporal priority of the Abrahamic promise: "The law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void." This chronological argument establishes a hermeneutical principle: the later covenant (Law) must be interpreted in light of the earlier covenant (promise) rather than vice versa. The promise provides the interpretive framework for understanding the Law's purpose.
Paul further distinguishes these covenants in Galatians 4:21-31 through allegorical interpretation of the Sarah/Hagar narrative. The child of the slave woman (Hagar) represents the covenant "from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery" (4:24), while the child of the free woman (Sarah) represents the covenant of promise. Paul concludes, "we are not children of the slave but of the free woman" (4:31), indicating that believers relate to God primarily through the covenant of promise rather than the Sinai covenant.
This priority of promise appears again in Romans 4, where Paul presents Abraham's faith-based righteousness as the paradigm for all who believe. Abraham "received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised" (Rom 4:11), establishing a pattern of faith-righteousness prior to and independent of Law observance. This pattern defines the heritage of "Abraham, who is the father of us all" (4:16), both Jews and Gentiles who share his faith.
The Law, in Paul's framework, served several purposes within this promise-centered narrative:
First, the Law defined and intensified sin, transforming general human wrongdoing into specific transgression against divine commandment. As Paul states in Romans 5:20, "the law came in to increase the trespass," and in Romans 7:7, "if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin." This revelatory function made the depth of human sinfulness explicit, preparing for the revelation of grace in Christ.
Second, the Law preserved Israel's distinct identity during the period between promise and fulfillment. In Galatians 3:23, Paul writes that "before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed." This "imprisonment" served a protective function, maintaining Israel's covenant identity as the people through whom God's promise would be fulfilled.
Third, the Law foreshadowed Christ through its sacrificial system, priestly offices, and prophecies. In Colossians 2:16-17 (if Pauline), Paul states that food laws, festivals, and Sabbaths "are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ." This typological function established patterns that found their fulfillment in Christ's person and work.
Christ's coming transforms the relationship between Law and promise. As the offspring to whom the promise was made (Gal 3:16) and the one who redeems "those who were under the law" (Gal 4:5), Christ fulfills both covenantal streams while establishing a new relationship between them. He embodies the promised blessing to Abraham that would extend to "all the families of the earth" (Gen 12:3), while simultaneously fulfilling "the righteous requirement of the law" (Rom 8:4).
This transformation alters the Law's function without abrogating its divine origin or moral content. The Law no longer defines covenant membership, as Paul argues throughout Galatians. It no longer pronounces condemnation on those "in Christ Jesus" (Rom 8:1). It no longer operates as an external code but is fulfilled through the internal work of the Spirit who produces love, the Law's summary (Rom 13:8-10; Gal 5:14).
As the τέλος of the Law, Christ reorients the Law within the broader narrative of God's redemptive work. The Law's preparatory role in salvation history reaches its fulfillment in Christ, who both brings its covenant administration to completion and embodies the righteousness it prescribed but could not produce. This understanding maintains both the divine purpose of the Law within salvation history and its transformed function in the lives of believers.
Second Temple Jewish Perspectives on Torah's Goal
Paul's statement that "Christ is the τέλος of the law" (Rom 10:4) emerges within a context of diverse Jewish perspectives on Torah's purpose and fulfillment. While the specific formulation is distinctively Pauline, the concept of Torah having a goal or purpose beyond itself appears in various forms within Second Temple Judaism.
The Psalms of Solomon, composed in the first century BCE, anticipate a messianic figure who will lead Israel in righteousness: "And he will be a righteous king over them, taught by God. There will be no unrighteousness among them in his days, for all shall be holy, and their king shall be the Lord Messiah" (Pss. Sol. 17:32-33). This expectation suggests that Torah observance points toward a future messianic era where righteousness will be perfectly realized.
The Dead Sea Scrolls community understood their rigorous Torah observance as preparation for the eschatological age. The Damascus Document describes how the community's strict adherence to legal interpretations preserves a remnant "until the coming of the Messiah of Aaron and Israel" (CD 12:23-13:1), suggesting that Torah observance serves a preparatory function within salvation history.
Apocalyptic texts like 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, though post-Pauline, likely reflect traditions circulating in the first century. These texts anticipate an eschatological transformation where Torah will function differently. 4 Ezra describes how "the heart of the earth's inhabitants shall be changed and converted to a different spirit" (4 Ezra 6:26), suggesting that the messianic age will bring internal transformation rather than merely external obedience.
Rabbinic traditions, though compiled later, may preserve earlier perspectives. Genesis Rabbah 98:9 interprets Genesis 49:10 ("The scepter shall not depart from Judah... until Shiloh comes") as referring to the Messiah, to whom royalty belongs. This interpretation suggests that the Torah's legal provisions point toward a messianic figure who will fulfill divine purpose.
These diverse perspectives demonstrate that Paul's understanding of Christ as the Law's τέλος, while distinctively christological, emerges within a context of Jewish reflection on Torah's relationship to messianic expectations. Paul's innovation lies not in seeing Torah as having a goal beyond itself but in identifying Jesus of Nazareth as the specific fulfillment of that goal.
The Law of Christ: Continuity in Transformation
Paul's declaration that "Christ is the τέλος of the law" (Rom 10:4) raises an important question: What happens to the Law's moral guidance in the lives of believers? While Paul clearly states that believers are "not under law but under grace" (Rom 6:14) and "released from the law" (Rom 7:6), he also insists that faith does not "overthrow the law" but "upholds the law" (Rom 3:31) and that "the righteous requirement of the law" is "fulfilled in us" who walk according to the Spirit (Rom 8:4).
These seemingly contradictory statements find resolution in Paul's concept of "the law of Christ" (ὁ νόμος τοῦ Χριστοῦ/ho nomos tou Christou). This phrase appears explicitly in Galatians 6:2—"Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ"—and implicitly in 1 Corinthians 9:21, where Paul describes himself as "not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ" (μὴ ὢν ἄνομος θεοῦ ἀλλ' ἔννομος Χριστοῦ/mē ōn anomos theou all' ennomps Christou).
The precise content of this "law of Christ" remains debated, but several elements appear consistently in Paul's ethical instruction:
First, the law of Christ centers on love as the fulfillment of the Law's moral demands. In Romans 13:8-10, Paul states that "the one who loves another has fulfilled the law" and "love is the fulfilling of the law." Similarly, in Galatians 5:14, he writes that "the whole law is fulfilled in one word: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'" This focus on love as the Law's essence reflects Jesus' own summary of the Law (Matt 22:36-40) and suggests continuity between Mosaic ethics and Christian practice.
Second, the law of Christ operates through the internal guidance of the Spirit rather than external code. In Romans 7:6, believers "serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code." In 2 Corinthians 3:3, they are "a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts." This internalization fulfills Jeremiah's prophecy that God would write the law on hearts rather than tablets (Jer 31:33) and Ezekiel's promise of a new spirit within God's people (Ezek 36:26-27).
Third, the law of Christ produces fruit that exceeds the Law's explicit demands while fulfilling its underlying intent. In Galatians 5:22-23, Paul describes the "fruit of the Spirit" as "love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control," then adds, "against such things there is no law." This striking statement suggests that Spirit-led living fulfills the Law's moral purpose so completely that explicit prohibition becomes unnecessary.
Fourth, the law of Christ operates through transformed human agency rather than autonomous effort. In Philippians 2:12-13, Paul instructs believers to "work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure." This paradoxical formulation maintains human responsibility while acknowledging divine enablement—a synthesis impossible under the old covenant.
These elements establish both continuity and transformation in Paul's understanding of the Law's ethical content. The continuity appears in the persistent emphasis on love as the Law's essence and the continued validity of moral principles found in the Decalogue (cf. Rom 13:9). The transformation appears in the means of fulfillment—internal Spirit-guidance rather than external code—and the eschatological context of life "in Christ" rather than "under Law."
This understanding helps explain Paul's seemingly contradictory statements about the Law. Believers are "not under law" as a covenant administration or means of justification, yet they "uphold the law" through Spirit-led living that fulfills its moral purpose. Christ is the "end" (τέλος) of the Law in that he terminates its function as covenant administration while simultaneously being its "goal" (τέλος) in embodying and enabling the righteousness it prescribed.
As Richard Hays observes, "The law of Christ is not a new set of commandments replacing the old; rather, it is a new mode of embodying Torah through participation in Christ and reliance on the power of his Spirit." This formulation maintains the divine origin and moral authority of the Law while recognizing the transformative impact of Christ and the Spirit on how believers relate to its demands.
Theological Synthesis: Christ as the τέλος of the Law
Paul's declaration that "Christ is the τέλος of the law" (Rom 10:4) provides a hermeneutical key for understanding his complex theology of the Law. The multivalent term τέλος encompasses termination, goal, and fulfillment, allowing Paul to maintain both continuity and discontinuity in his understanding of Christ's relationship to the Law.
As the termination of the Law, Christ brings to an end several of its functions. First, he terminates the Law's role as covenant administration. Believers are "not under law but under grace" (Rom 6:14) because Christ has established a "new covenant" (1 Cor 11:25) that supersedes the Sinai covenant. Second, he terminates the Law's condemnation of sinners. There is "now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus" (Rom 8:1) because Christ has borne the curse of the Law (Gal 3:13). Third, he terminates the Law's function as identity marker separating Jews and Gentiles. In Christ, there is "neither Jew nor Greek" (Gal 3:28) because he has created "one new man in place of the two" (Eph 2:15).
As the goal of the Law, Christ embodies what the Law anticipated. First, he fulfills the Law's moral demands through perfect obedience, becoming "the righteous one" (Rom 5:19) whose righteousness is imputed to believers. Second, he fulfills the Law's sacrificial system, offering himself as the definitive sacrifice that accomplishes what animal sacrifices foreshadowed (Rom 3:25). Third, he fulfills the Law's covenant promises, being the offspring of Abraham through whom blessing comes to "all the families of the earth" (Gal 3:16; Gen 12:3).
As the fulfillment of the Law, Christ transforms its function in believers' lives. Rather than an external code demanding obedience, the Law's "righteous requirement" is "fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit" (Rom 8:4). Rather than a "ministry of condemnation" written on stone, the Law becomes the "ministry of the Spirit" written on hearts (2 Cor 3:7-8). Rather than a burden that enslaves, the Law becomes the "perfect law of liberty" (Jas 1:25) through which believers serve in freedom.
This multifaceted understanding resolves the apparent contradictions in Paul's statements about the Law. When Paul speaks negatively about the Law, he refers to its function as covenant administration, its inability to justify sinners, or its exploitation by sin. When he speaks positively, he refers to its divine origin, its revelation of God's will, and its fulfillment in Christ and the Spirit.
Paul's theology of the Law thus maintains both the unity of God's purpose across redemptive history and the transformative significance of Christ's coming. As N.T. Wright explains, "Paul's view of the law is neither a repudiation of Judaism's understanding of Torah nor a simplistic replacement of it. It is, rather, a redemptive-historical account of how Torah functions within the larger story of God's purposes, reaching its telos—both its goal and its endpoint—in Christ."
This nuanced understanding illuminates Paul's distinctive contribution to early Christian theology. While maintaining his Jewish appreciation for Torah as divine revelation, Paul reinterpreted its role in light of Christ's death and resurrection. This reinterpretation neither simply discarded the Law as irrelevant nor maintained its function unchanged, but discerned its fulfillment in Christ and transformation through the Spirit.
Conclusion
Summary of Paul's Theology of the Law and New Covenant
This study has examined Paul's complex and nuanced theology of the Law and New Covenant through four case studies: Romans 7:7-25 on the Law as divine revelation and burden, Galatians 3:15-25 on the Law's function in revealing sin, 2 Corinthians 3:1-18 on the contrast between old and new covenants, and Romans 10:4 on Christ as the τέλος of the Law.
Several consistent themes emerge across these texts, demonstrating the coherence of Paul's theological vision despite the occasional tensions in his expressions:
First, Paul consistently affirms the divine origin and inherent goodness of the Law. He describes it as "holy and righteous and good" (Rom 7:12) and acknowledges its genuine glory (2 Cor 3:7-11). At no point does Paul attribute the Law's limitations to deficiency in its content or divine origin. Rather, he locates the problem in the human condition under sin and in the Law's historical function before Christ.
Second, Paul presents the Law as having a complex and multifaceted role within salvation history. It served as a temporary guardian (παιδαγωγός) until Christ came (Gal 3:24-25), revealed and intensified sin to prepare for the revelation of grace (Rom 5:20; 7:13), and preserved Israel's distinct identity during the period between promise and fulfillment (Gal 3:19-23). These varied functions operated simultaneously rather than sequentially, reflecting the Law's comprehensive significance within God's redemptive plan.
Third, Paul consistently emphasizes the Law's inability to produce the righteousness it prescribed. This limitation stemmed not from deficiency in the Law itself but from the weakness of the flesh (Rom 8:3). The Law could define righteousness and diagnose sin but could not transform sinners into righteous people. This inability created the need for a new covenant based on the Spirit's transformative power rather than external code.
Fourth, Paul presents Christ as the τέλος of the Law in a multivalent sense: terminating its role as covenant administration while simultaneously fulfilling its moral demands and transforming its function in believers' lives. This complex relationship establishes both continuity and discontinuity between old and new covenants. The moral purpose of the Law continues while its means of operation changes through the Spirit.
Fifth, Paul understands the new covenant as characterized by the Spirit's transformative power, writing God's law on human hearts rather than stone tablets. This internal transformation fulfills Jeremiah's prophecy (Jer 31:31-34) and Ezekiel's promise (Ezek 36:26-27), allowing believers to fulfill the "righteous requirement of the law" (Rom 8:4) through new means. The Spirit enables what the Law prescribed but could not produce.
Sixth, Paul maintains that faith in Christ neither nullifies the Law (Rom 3:31) nor licenses moral indifference (Rom 6:1-2, 15). Rather, it establishes the Law's true purpose while transforming how believers relate to its demands. The "law of Christ" operates through love as the fulfillment of the Law (Gal 5:14; Rom 13:8-10) and through the Spirit's guidance rather than external code.
These themes demonstrate that Paul's theology of the Law is neither simplistic rejection nor uncritical continuation but a sophisticated reinterpretation in light of Christ and the Spirit. This reinterpretation maintains both the divine origin of the Law and its transformed function within the new covenant.
Contemporary Theological Implications
Paul's theology of the Law and New Covenant yields several significant implications for contemporary theological reflection:
First, it challenges simplistic oppositions between law and grace, Jewish legalism and Christian freedom. Paul's nuanced understanding suggests that such dichotomies misrepresent both Jewish theology and Christian ethics. The Law itself was a gift of divine grace, and grace establishes rather than abolishes moral obligation. As Krister Stendahl famously observed, "Paul's gospel was about the inclusion of Gentiles, not a treatise against Jewish 'legalism.'" This recognition can foster more fruitful Jewish-Christian dialogue and more nuanced Christian self-understanding.
Second, it provides a model for reading Scripture across covenantal transitions. Paul neither discards the Hebrew Scriptures as irrelevant nor applies them without christological reinterpretation. Rather, he discerns how Christ fulfills patterns embedded in these texts while transforming their application for believers. This hermeneutic avoids both supersessionism that dismisses Judaism and flat continuity that minimizes Christ's transformative significance. It suggests a way of reading Scripture that honors both its historical particularity and its continuing theological significance.
Third, it offers a framework for understanding the relationship between inner transformation and external law. Paul's emphasis on the Spirit writing God's law on hearts suggests that Christian ethics involves neither lawless subjectivity nor rigid codification. Rather, it entails the internalization of divine values through the Spirit's work, guided by the pattern of Christ and the moral wisdom of Scripture. This framework navigates between moral relativism and legalistic rigidity, suggesting ethical discernment guided by both divine principles and contextual wisdom.
Fourth, it provides theological grounding for ecclesial unity amid diversity. Paul's insistence that in Christ there is "neither Jew nor Greek" (Gal 3:28) while simultaneously acknowledging legitimate diversity in practice (Rom 14:1-23) suggests a model of unity based on common faith in Christ rather than uniform cultural expression. This model allows churches to maintain distinctive traditions while recognizing their fundamental unity in Christ—a crucial consideration in an increasingly global Christianity.
Fifth, it illuminates the relationship between divine and human agency in moral transformation. Paul's paradoxical formulations—"work out your own salvation... for it is God who works in you" (Phil 2:12-13), "I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me" (1 Cor 15:10)—suggest a synergistic model where divine enablement and human responsibility operate concurrently rather than competitively. This framework avoids both passive quietism and self-reliant moralism, suggesting a path of active participation in the Spirit's transformative work.
Finally, it offers hope for genuine moral transformation through the Spirit's power. Paul's emphasis on the new covenant's ability to accomplish what the Law could not—writing God's will on human hearts through the Spirit—suggests that ethical growth comes not primarily through intensified effort but through deeper engagement with the Spirit. This perspective counters both moral pessimism that expects little change and triumphalism that ignores ongoing struggle, offering a realistic hope grounded in the Spirit's work.
These implications demonstrate the continuing relevance of Paul's theology for contemporary Christian thought and practice. His sophisticated understanding of the Law and New Covenant addresses perennial theological questions about divine-human relationship, moral transformation, scriptural interpretation, and ecclesial unity. By carefully attending to the historical particularity of Paul's arguments while discerning their broader theological significance, we gain valuable resources for navigating these questions in our own contexts.
Directions for Further Research
This study suggests several promising avenues for further research on Paul's theology of the Law and New Covenant:
First, deeper exploration of potential differences among Paul's letters would enrich our understanding of his theological development. While this study has emphasized the coherence of Paul's thought, nuanced differences exist among his discussions of the Law in Galatians, Romans, and 2 Corinthians. Investigating whether these differences reflect historical development in Paul's thinking, contextual adaptation to different audiences, or complementary emphases within a consistent theological framework would refine our understanding of his thought.
Second, more sustained comparison between Paul's understanding of the Law and other first-century Jewish perspectives would illuminate both commonalities and distinctive contributions. While this study has situated Paul within the context of Second Temple Judaism, more detailed comparison with specific texts and communities—Qumran, Philo, rabbinic traditions, apocalyptic literature—would provide greater precision in understanding Paul's position within the diverse Jewish theological landscape.
Third, examination of how Paul's theology of the Law relates to his apocalyptic framework would yield important insights. Scholars like J. Louis Martyn have emphasized the apocalyptic dimensions of Paul's theology, seeing the Christ-event as an apocalyptic intervention that reconfigures cosmic reality. Exploring how this apocalyptic framework shapes Paul's understanding of the Law's function and fulfillment would deepen our appreciation of his theological vision.
Fourth, investigation of Paul's hermeneutical practices in interpreting the Hebrew Scriptures would illuminate his approach to the Law. Paul frequently quotes and alludes to scriptural texts, often in ways that modern readers find surprising. Analyzing the exegetical techniques he employs—typology, allegory, midrash, pesher—would enhance our understanding of how he discerns Christ as the Law's τέλος.
Fifth, exploration of how Paul's theology of the Law influenced subsequent Christian tradition would trace important theological developments. Early church fathers, medieval theologians, Reformation thinkers, and modern interpreters have all engaged with Paul's complex statements about the Law, often emphasizing different aspects of his thought. Examining these reception histories would illuminate both the richness of Paul's theology and its diverse interpretations across time and contexts.
Sixth, consideration of how Paul's theology of the Law might inform contemporary Jewish-Christian dialogue would promote interfaith understanding. Paul's status as both committed Jew and apostle to the Gentiles positions his thought at the intersection of Jewish and Christian traditions. Exploring how his theology might foster mutual understanding rather than supersessionist claims would contribute to constructive interfaith relationships.
These research directions suggest the continuing vitality of Pauline scholarship and its potential contributions to both academic understanding and practical theological wisdom. Paul's sophisticated theology of the Law and New Covenant remains a rich resource for contemporary reflection on divine revelation, covenant relationship, moral transformation, and interfaith dialogue.
Final Synthesis
Paul's theology of the Law and New Covenant emerges from this study as a sophisticated framework that maintains both continuity and discontinuity within God's redemptive work. As a former Pharisee who became the apostle to the Gentiles, Paul uniquely integrated deep reverence for Torah as divine revelation with radical reinterpretation of its function in light of Christ and the Spirit.
Several key insights summarize Paul's distinctive contribution:
First, Paul maintained that the Law was a divine gift even while acknowledging its limitations in a fallen world. The Law was "holy and righteous and good" (Rom 7:12), yet it became a "ministry of death" (2 Cor 3:7) when confronted by human sinfulness. This paradox reflected not contradiction in Paul's thought but profound theological insight: the same divine standards that reveal God's righteousness also expose human unrighteousness, thereby serving both revelatory and diagnostic functions.
Second, Paul understood the Law within a salvation-historical framework that recognized its legitimate but temporary role. The Law was a "guardian until Christ came" (Gal 3:24), serving purposes that were genuinely divine yet provisional within God's unfolding plan. This temporal qualification allowed Paul to affirm both the Law's divine origin and its relativization in light of Christ's coming.
Third, Paul discerned in Christ both the fulfillment of what the Law anticipated and the transformation of how believers relate to its demands. Christ is the τέλος of the Law (Rom 10:4) in the multivalent sense of its goal, fulfillment, and endpoint. This complex relationship established a framework where the Law's moral purpose continues while its covenantal function changes.
Fourth, Paul recognized the Spirit as the decisive agent of transformation under the new covenant. The Spirit writes God's law on human hearts rather than stone tablets (2 Cor 3:3), enabling believers to fulfill the Law's "righteous requirement" (Rom 8:4) through internal transformation rather than external conformity. This pneumatological emphasis fulfilled prophetic expectations of covenant renewal (Jer 31:31-34; Ezek 36:26-27) while establishing a distinctively Christian understanding of moral transformation.
Fifth, Paul maintained that faith in Christ establishes rather than abolishes the Law's true purpose. Through faith "we uphold the law" (Rom 3:31) even while being "released from the law" (Rom 7:6) as a covenant administration. This paradoxical affirmation suggests that Paul understood faith as the means of discovering and fulfilling the Law's deepest intention rather than escaping its moral demands.
These insights demonstrate that Paul's theology transcends simplistic categorizations as either rejecting or maintaining the Law unchanged. Instead, he offers a nuanced understanding that recognizes both the Law's divine origin and its transformed function in Christ. This theology emerged not as abstract reflection but as pastoral response to concrete questions about Gentile inclusion, community formation, and the relationship between grace and moral obligation.
For contemporary theology, Paul's sophisticated framework offers valuable resources for navigating perennial questions about divine revelation, covenant relationship, moral transformation, and interfaith dialogue. By carefully attending to both the historical particularity of Paul's arguments and their enduring theological significance, we gain deeper understanding of how divine purposes unfold across redemptive history while maintaining fundamental continuity amid transformative development.
As Richard Hays eloquently summarizes, "Paul's view of the Law is neither celebration nor rejection but discernment of its place within the narrative of God's redemptive action in Christ." This narrative-centered understanding allows Paul to maintain both the Law's divine origin and its christological fulfillment—a theological achievement that continues to illuminate Christian reflection on God's unfolding purposes in human history.
Bibliography
Barclay, John M.G. Paul and the Gift. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.
Barrett, C.K. A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.
Bell, Richard H. No One Seeks for God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 1:18-3:20. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.
Boyarin, Daniel. A Radical Jew: Paul and the Politics of Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Bruce, F.F. Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.
Campbell, Douglas A. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
Carson, D.A., Peter T. O'Brien, and Mark A. Seifrid, eds. Justification and Variegated Nomism: The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism. Vol. 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.
Childs, Brevard S. Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.
Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.
Cranfield, C.E.B. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975.
Das, A. Andrew. Paul and the Stories of Israel: Grand Thematic Narratives in Galatians. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.
———. Paul, the Law, and the Covenant. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2001.
Dunn, James D.G. The New Perspective on Paul. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.
———. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.
Eastman, Susan Grove. Paul and the Person: Reframing Paul's Anthropology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017.
Fee, Gordon D. God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1994.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday, 1993.
Fredriksen, Paula. Paul: The Pagans' Apostle. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
Gathercole, Simon J. Where Is Boasting? Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul's Response in Romans 1–5. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. When in Romans: An Invitation to Linger with the Gospel according to Paul. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.
Gorman, Michael J. Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul's Narrative Soteriology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
Hafemann, Scott J. Paul, Moses, and the History of Israel: The Letter/Spirit Contrast and the Argument from Scripture in 2 Corinthians 3. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1995.
Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
———. The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Galatians 3:1–4:11. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
Hengel, Martin. The Pre-Christian Paul. London: SCM Press, 1991.
Hooker, Morna D. From Adam to Christ: Essays on Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Horbury, William. Jewish Messianism and the Cult of Christ. London: SCM Press, 1998.
Jewett, Robert. Romans: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007.
Johnson, Luke Timothy. Reading Romans: A Literary and Theological Commentary. New York: Crossroad, 1997.
Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. The Uses of the Old Testament in the New. Chicago: Moody Press, 1985.
Kim, Seyoon. The Origin of Paul's Gospel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982.
Kugler, Robert A. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. Guides to Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.
Longenecker, Richard N. Paul, Apostle of Liberty. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.
———. The Epistle to the Romans: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016.
Martyn, J. Louis. Galatians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday, 1997.
McCormack, Bruce L. Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006.
Moo, Douglas J. The Epistle to the Romans. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.
Nanos, Mark D. The Mystery of Romans: The Jewish Context of Paul's Letter. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.
Novenson, Matthew V. Christ among the Messiahs: Christ Language in Paul and Messiah Language in Ancient Judaism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Piper, John. The Future of Justification: A Response to N.T. Wright. Wheaton: Crossway, 2007.
Sanders, E.P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.
———. Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983.
Schreiner, Thomas R. The Law and Its Fulfillment: A Pauline Theology of Law. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1993.
Schweitzer, Albert. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. Translated by William Montgomery. London: A. & C. Black, 1931.
Seifrid, Mark A. Christ, Our Righteousness: Paul's Theology of Justification. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2000.
Segal, Alan F. Paul the Convert: The Apostolate and Apostasy of Saul the Pharisee. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
Stendahl, Krister. Paul Among Jews and Gentiles and Other Essays. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976.
Stuhlmacher, Peter. Revisiting Paul's Doctrine of Justification: A Challenge to the New Perspective. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2001.
Thielman, Frank. Paul and the Law: A Contextual Approach. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1994.
Thiselton, Anthony C. The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.
Tobin, Thomas H. Paul's Rhetoric in Its Contexts: The Argument of Romans. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2004.
VanLandingham, Chris. Judgment and Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2006.
Vermes, Geza. The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English. Rev. ed. London: Penguin, 2004.
Watson, Francis. Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith. London: T&T Clark, 2004.
———. Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.
Westerholm, Stephen. Perspectives Old and New on Paul: The "Lutheran" Paul and His Critics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.
Witherington, Ben, III. Paul's Narrative Thought World: The Tapestry of Tragedy and Triumph. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1994.
Wright, N.T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Christian Origins and the Question of God, vol. 4. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013.
———. The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.
———. Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision. London: SPCK, 2009.
